Tribute to an Old Saint
Editor's note: Buck Holloway passed away around 3:30 a.m. Friday, just hours after this column was posted
Posted by Nathan at 8:58 AM 0 comments
Going through some paperwork the other day when I came across this gem that I put together a few years ago. This is from the book of First John and describes at least 44 characteristics of those who know God. This is helpful in discerning our own spiritual condition as well as helping us to discern whether or not others have experienced the new birth in Christ.
Those who know God:
Do not walk in darkness-1:6
Admit their sin-1:8
Keep His commandments-2:3
Have the love of God perfected in them-2:5
Walk as Christ walked-2:6
Love their brothers-2:9
Have no cause for stumbling-2:10
Walk in the light-2:11
Know where they are going, do not stumble-2:11
Remain in fellowship with God’s children-2:19
Have an anointing from the Holy One, and know all things-2:20
Acknowledge the Father and the Son-2:22-23
Practice righteousness-2:29
Are strangers in this world-3:1
Are His children-3:2
Will be like Him when He is revealed-3:2
Will one day see Him as He is-3:2
Do not continue in sin-3:9
Cannot continue in sin-3:9
Practice righteousness-3:10
Love the brethren-3:10
Are hated by the world-3:13
Have eternal life abiding in them-3:15
Love in deed and in truth-3:19
Receive what they ask from God-3:22
Keep His commandments-3:22
Do what is pleasing in His sight-3:22
Believe in the Name of His Son, Jesus Christ-3:23
Love one another-3:23
Abide in God-3:24
Have God abiding in them-3:24
Have God’s Spirit abiding in them-3:24
Confess Jesus Christ-4:2
Overcome the world-4:4
Hear the apostle’s teaching-4:6
Love one another-4:7
Have God’s love perfected in them-4:12
Know and believe the love God has for them-4:16
Have boldness in the day of judgment-4:17
Do not continue in sin-5:1
Keep themselves safe-5:18
Are not touched by the wicked one-5:18
Know that the Son of God has come-5:20
Have been given understanding, so that they may know Him who is true-5:22
Posted by Nathan at 10:50 PM 0 comments Labels: Discernment, Knowing God, Spiritual Fruit
The gavel dropped today on the divorce of my parents with stark finality. 28 years, 3 children and 3 grandchildren testify to a love that is lost. This love was once strong and vibrant, but somewhere along the way, love began keeping a record of wrongs. Love is not supposed to be like that. It is supposed to conquer enemies and overcome obstacles on it's way to deeper intimacy and trust. I guess these romantic notions lose their effect when one is immersed in diapers, carpools, PTA meetings and all the rest.
Pure love was eventually eroded by selfishness. The eyes of the heart grew weary of beholding it's lover and turned to itself. The relationship descended in the direction of "unmet needs," which became as gods. There were seasons of jubilance, where love fought valiantly and God spoke clarity. These glorious seasons, however, departed and gave way to a winter of regret and hostility, where words thrash and hearts, as ice, harden.
Love is now gone. Questions abound.
What about my marriage? How will I fight? Will Christ be the center, and will He have supremacy over every thought? Or will I give in to a lustful laziness?
Each moment matters from the perspective of eternity. I am always moving in one of two directions. On one side is love for God, which includes loving my wife. On the other side is love for the world. I am always moving in one of these directions. When faced with a temptation, I can strengthen my faith and intimacy with God by remembering His promises, or I can give in to the passing pleasures of sin. Each temptation is an opportunity for me to learn obedience and to fight the good fight of faith.
Posted by Nathan at 8:02 PM 1 comments Labels: Divorce
After speaking with my wife about the former issue of egalitarianism, I see the need to define my terms and soften my language somewhat.
When I say egalitarianism, (which is a great word, meaning "characterized by belief in the equality of all people, esp. in political, economic, or social life) I am speaking of those who see no distinction of roles between men and women in the church or in marriage. Please do not misunderstand, I am fully supportive of those who are proponents of women's rights, ie the right to vote, equal employment rights, the right to fair wages, the right to bodily integrity and autonomy, etc. These rights were gained at great cost to both women and men and must be protected.
As I wrestle and think through the applicable passages of Scripture, I see the biblical role of pastor/teacher/elder reserved for men alone. Many interpret this to say that women, because they can't fulfill this role, are of less value than men. There are roles, however, filled by women that can't be fulfilled by men, the primary role being that of mother. Men can't bear children nor can they meet the needs of children who were created to be nurtured and loved by a mother. Personally speaking, I am fully aware of my own inability to love my kids as my wife does. I do not have the patience, the endurance nor the energy to see that my children's needs for love and affection are met. If, God forbid, something were to happen to her and she wasn't there to care for the kids, they would not be nearly as healthy and well-rounded as if she did care for and nourish them. Not to mention all they'd ever eat is cereal.
Roles have nothing to do with value. This is clearly seen in the doctrine of the Trinity. The Son is submissive to the Father and the Spirit is submissive to the Son, being sent by the Son and whose purpose is to glorify the Son. As the Athanasian Creed asserts, "For there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit. But the godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, is all one, the glory equal, the majesty co-eternal."
Lastly, I am deeply grateful and humbled by a wife who trusts me to lead, who challenges my thinking, and who listens to my endless ramblings. God is good.
Posted by Nathan at 1:44 PM 1 comments Labels: Complimentarianism, Egalitarianism
I was recently given a book by a friend entitled, "Evangelical Feminism: A New Path to Liberalism?" It was a good read, and served to increase my passion for the subject. As Grudem explained, in many cases the hermeneutic that leads one to accept the position that men and women are entitled to equal roles within the church also leads one to water down the teaching on homosexuality.
For instance, Roy Clements says:
As a result, Christian homosexuals, who formerly would have remained "in the closet" protected by a conspiracy of sympathetic silence, have little choice but to "come out". For most this has been a profoundly liberating experience, in spite of the bullying hostility to which they have often been subjected. In many ways their experience has run parallel, if a little behind, that of Christian women in the last few decades. In the wake of the secular feminist movement, women have found a new confidence to claim a role for themselves within the church. They have developed a hermeneutic to deal with the biblical texts which had been used to deny them that role in the past. Of course, this was not achieved without resistance from a conservative rump mainly within the older ecclesiastical establishment, but the majority of evangelicals have now moved very substantially in the direction of welcoming women into Christian leadership. Gay Christians are using exactly the same kind of hermeneutic tools to challenge tradition in regard to homosexuality. If it is taking them rather longer to succeed than the Christian feminists did, this has more to do with the inferiority of their numerical strength than of the justice of their cause.
Amazing.
Egalitarians and homosexuals have identified that Scripture does not warrant certain things, and with increased pressure from culture to become more "tolerant" they have formulated a hermeneutic that will allow them to make God in their own image. One way this takes shape is through the "Trajectory Hermeneutic" which, according to Grudem is "a method of interpreting the Bible in which our final authority is not found in what is written in the Bible itself, but is found later, at the end of a 'trajectory' along with the New Testament was progressing at the time it was being written. This view would claim that the New Testament authors did not reach the final destination of these developments, but we can sense the direction or the trajectory along which they were moving, see where they were headed, and carry their thinking further, until we reach the destination they were moving torward but did not reach in their thinking and writing."
This hermeneutic seems to validate Scripture in that it acknowledges that one can't use the Bible to support these beliefs and one must therefore add to the word of God in order to be justified in their thinking.
Why must truth change? Or better, why do so many see the need to change truth? What is it about the spirit of this age that would lead people to reject an old truth in favor of "diversity, tolerance, creativity, progress" and whatever other buzzwords may be used to place relativistic ideas in a positive light?
I know these views can be labeled as full of pride and arrogance, but is it really arrogant to submit to what God has said rather than change the words of God to achieve a desired goal of tolerance, cultural relevance and diversity? Obviously Christians need to hold all of these attributes to a degree, and I'm not arguing against contextualization, but didn't God say that "friendship with the world is enmity with God"? (James 4:4) If we water down the truth, and then see people come to faith as a result of our watered down message, do they really have an authentic faith? If we convince people that hell isn't real, that men and women are without difference, that homosexuality is acceptable, that God doesn't know "the end from the beginning," and that Christ is not the only way, are they really followers of Christ?
Posted by Nathan at 6:21 PM 0 comments Labels: Egalitarianism, Grudem